The answer
Record the new version and tell reviewers which behavior changed. Recheck affected findings against that version rather than assuming earlier results still apply.
Why should code review and QA run while the developer performs manual testing?
What happens when the implementation changes during review?
More FAQs in Why should code review and QA run while the developer performs manual testing?
It is useful after a coherent implementation checkpoint exists and participants have clear assignments. Unstable inputs can create more coordination work than the parallelism saves.
One tester may complete, edit, or delete data another tester expects to remain unchanged. Separate fixtures make failures reproducible and easier to attribute.
Still have questions?
Browse all our FAQs or reach out to our support team
Want to upskill yourself?
Your learning library
Small steps. Big possibilities.
Find your next course. Build something great.