The answer
Recognize it as currying. Start with the simple solution (terminate with empty call). Explain how closures accumulate the sum. Mention toString as an alternative. Handle follow-ups like multiple arguments.
sum(1)(2)(3) Interview Tips for Amazon
How should I approach the sum(1)(2)(3) Amazon question in an interview?
More FAQs in sum(1)(2)(3) Interview Tips for Amazon
Not returning a function (the chain breaks), not accumulating the previous value, no termination mechanism (no way to get the result), and overcomplicating (using classes or complex state instead of a simple closure).
Yes. After the basic solution, mention that you could also use toString or valueOf for automatic type coercion. This shows deeper JavaScript knowledge (type coercion, toString, valueOf).
Step by step: sum(1) returns a function with a=1. Calling it with 2 returns sum(3) (a new function with a=3). Each call accumulates. Calling with no argument returns the accumulated sum. Each step uses a closure.
Still have questions?
Browse all our FAQs or reach out to our support team
Want to upskill yourself?
Your learning library
Small steps. Big possibilities.
Find your next course. Build something great.