Facebook Pixel

How do you fix the classic var loop and setTimeout closure bug?

Use let instead of var (each iteration gets a fresh binding), or wrap the body in an IIFE that captures the current value of i as a parameter.

Verify This Answer

Cross-check this information using these trusted sources:

More FAQs in Hoisting in Loops and Conditionals in JavaScript

Because var is function-scoped. There is one i shared by all iterations. By the time the setTimeout callbacks run, the loop has finished and i equals the final value, so all callbacks log that value.

Because let is block-scoped and the spec gives each iteration a fresh binding. Each closure captures its own copy of i, so callbacks log 0, 1, 2 instead of the final value.

Yes. var ignores block boundaries (except function bodies), so a var inside an if is hoisted to the enclosing function or global scope. let and const are block-scoped and do not leak.

Still have questions?

Browse all our FAQs or reach out to our support team

Want to upskill yourself?

Our courses are taking a Coffee break, but your curiosity shouldn't. Stay engaged with namastedev linkedin, youtube, discord and other resources while you wait.

0
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.
Please Login.